Drake vs UMG: Super Bowl Performance Sparks Defamation Lawsuit

In a dramatic twist to one of hip hop’s most heated rivalries, Drake has officially taken legal action against Universal Music Group (UMG), claiming that Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl performance of Not Like Us was part of a calculated attack on his reputation.

According to amended legal filings, Drake argues that the high-profile halftime show — watched by over 133 million viewers — was designed to damage his image, even though specific inflammatory words were omitted from the live broadcast. The performance is being cited as the latest chapter in a long-running feud between the two rap giants.

Drake alleges that UMG actively promoted Lamar’s diss track for profit, and that the performance fueled public backlash, even leading to serious security incidents at his home. His lawsuit now includes these claims, further intensifying the legal pressure on the music label.

UMG has publicly dismissed the lawsuit as meritless, suggesting that Drake is being misled by legal advisors and warning that the case could backfire. They argue the lyrics and performance fall under creative expression and are not grounds for defamation.

This legal battle isn’t just about two artists — it’s about the power dynamics of the music industry, creative boundaries, and how public performances can cross into personal attacks.

With the court case ongoing, fans and industry insiders alike are watching closely to see how it all plays out.

For more exclusive music news and entertainment drama, stay tuned to Spate News.